Home Articles List Article Information
Aswan University Journal of Environmental Studies
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 6 (2025)
Volume Volume 5 (2024)
Volume Volume 4 (2023)
Volume Volume 3 (2022)
Volume Volume 2 (2021)
Volume Volume 1 (2020)
Albarbary, N., Karmi, M., Maky, M. (2021). Proximate Composition Analysis of Beef Sausage (Correction Manuscript 2). Aswan University Journal of Environmental Studies, 2(3), 155-161. doi: 10.21608/aujes.2021.71850.1018
Nady khairy Albarbary; Mohamed Karmi; Mohamed Abdelfattah Maky. "Proximate Composition Analysis of Beef Sausage (Correction Manuscript 2)". Aswan University Journal of Environmental Studies, 2, 3, 2021, 155-161. doi: 10.21608/aujes.2021.71850.1018
Albarbary, N., Karmi, M., Maky, M. (2021). 'Proximate Composition Analysis of Beef Sausage (Correction Manuscript 2)', Aswan University Journal of Environmental Studies, 2(3), pp. 155-161. doi: 10.21608/aujes.2021.71850.1018
Albarbary, N., Karmi, M., Maky, M. Proximate Composition Analysis of Beef Sausage (Correction Manuscript 2). Aswan University Journal of Environmental Studies, 2021; 2(3): 155-161. doi: 10.21608/aujes.2021.71850.1018

Proximate Composition Analysis of Beef Sausage (Correction Manuscript 2)

Article 1, Volume 2, Issue 3, September 2021, Page 155-161  XML PDF (677.79 K)
Document Type: Original Research
DOI: 10.21608/aujes.2021.71850.1018
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Nady khairy Albarbary email 1; Mohamed Karmi2; Mohamed Abdelfattah Maky3
1Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
2Fac, of Vet. Med. Food hygiene Department
3Fac. of Vet. Med. Food Hygiene Department
Abstract
Meat and meat products make an important nutritional contribution to the diet
of the people. Beef sausage is one of the most popular fast food in Egypt. This study was aimed to determine the proximate composition of beef sausage from market stalls and selected fast-food restaurants in Aswan. Accordingly, a total of 30 beef sausage samples were subjected to proximate analysis then compared with the Egyptian standards to determine their acceptability. The methods used for the determination of proximate composition were AOAC Official Methods 990.19, 973.48, 960.39, and 999.11 for moisture, protein, fat, and ash, respectively. The results revealed that the mean values of moisture, protein, fat, ash, and carbohydrates 74.07±0.65%, 12.9±0.54%, 6.87±0.38%, 1.50±0.08%, 1.5±0.83%, and 4.63±0.50% respectively. By comparing the results with the Egyptian Organization for Standardization No. 1972 (EOS, 2005), there was 56.67%, 40%, and 90% of the samples unaccepted based on their moisture, protein, and red meat contents, respectively, while all the samples were accepted based on their fat and ash contents. There were significant differences in the moisture, protein, fat, ash, and carbohydrate content of the beef sausage samples. The findings indicated that the nutritional composition of burger samples varied among different locations where a variation in preparation method was observed.
Keywords
sausage; meat; chemical composition; analysis
Main Subjects
Animal ecology; Ecotoxicology
Statistics
Article View: 1,354
PDF Download: 3,343